Blogs
Resources»Blogs
Blogs
Mar 11

Written by: Route 365
3/11/2010 5:00 AM 

1 Samuel 14:49-15:35 Week 10 : Day 4

by Ben Opp

This passage is rife with subtle clues about Saul's character.  It culminates in his removal as king over Israel, the result of much disobedience and many poor decisions over the past several chapters.

God's command to Saul was simple - totally destroy the Amalekites, wiping any memory of their civilization off the face of the earth.  The Amalekites were a people group who had launched a cowardly attack on Israel shortly after they left Egypt, killing the weak and feeble who were straggling behind the main body of the people.  God, in his particular concern for the welfare of the powerless, was tremendously angered by this.  The existence of this nation was an affront to the justice of God, and their total destruction would have sent a powerful message both to Israel and the surrounding nations regarding the high value God places on the defense of the powerless.

But, Saul did not obey.  Instead of totally destroying the Amalekites, his army took the choicest animals and plunder for themselves.  Saul seems to have "caved in" to the people's wishes out of fear.  There are other telltale signs of the condition of Saul's heart: after the battle, he goes off and builds a monument to himself (vs. 12), and speaks to Samuel of "the LORD your God," (vs. 15 and 21) separating himself from the God who made him king.

Why does God care so much about this seemingly small departure from his command?  After all, Saul killed everything else, and intended to sacrifice the plundered animals to the Lord.  So what's the big deal?  When Saul chose to not totally destroy the Amalekites, he fell short of fully submitting to God's command and failed to uphold God's character of justice.  In fact, he totally missed the point of God's command.  This was not just an isolated mission to destroy an enemy nation - it was an expression of God's character.  Saul's actions misrepresented and dishonored God's justice.

I think it makes sense to look at many of Saul's decisions in the light of his misunderstanding of the big picture.  He doesn't understand that God cares far more about obedience than about a bunch of sacrificed animals.  His goal is not to honor and obey God, but to appease him.  During his conversation with Samuel, he seems to care more about keeping his job than about the welfare of the nation.  Most importantly, he fails to understand that Israel is not just a nomadic people group, but stands at the center of God's plan to redeem the entire world from the brokenness caused by sin.

How do you view your relationship with God - are you trying to obey him, or appease him?  Is it just about getting what you want?  Do you, like Saul, only obey God when it is convenient or will lead to personal gain?  Or, do you see the your life as part of God's plan for the redemption of the world?

A fellow traveler,
Ben

Tags:

1 comment(s) so far...

Re: 1 Samuel 14:49-15:35 : Obeying God

Over the past couple of readings I've been pondering just exactly why Saul is rejected forever on the account of the mistakes he's made. When I think about the character portrait we've seen, he reminds a lot, believe it or not, of the apostle Peter -- impulsive, sometimes a bit dense, and stubborn. (A lot like myself, come to think of it. Hmm...) Peter denying his master, cutting off his enemy's servant's ear, and rebuking Jesus when he spoke of the things to come all seem remarkably similar--to me, at least--to the disobedience we've seen from Saul in the last couple of chapters. So why is it that the kingdom was torn away from Saul's family, while Peter was the rock on which Jesus promised to build his church (Mt. 16.18)? (And when I'm disobedient like them, what kind of results does it forebode?...)

Something you said in today's reflection, Ben, provides me something of an answer. Saul was definitely the "people's king": I was struck by the ringing endorsement the writer gives his *military* work in 14.47-48, which made him exactly the sort of king the people had wanted (8.20) -- one to lead them in battle and fight wars for them. Not to mention that he basically bowed to 'subject pressure' (I can't say 'peer pressure' when he's king and they're his subjects, right?) when the people wanted to keep the stuff from the Amalekites in today's reading (15.24). But the problem, as you said, is that God didn't anoint Saul to be the people's king -- the king that made them like all the nations around them. He appointed him to be his viceroy, his stand-in representative of his--God's--actual kingship over them, and as such they--and he!--were to be different. What Saul didn't get--and was consequently the wrong man for the job--was exactly what you said: that "Israel is not just a nomadic people group, but stands at the center of God's plan to redeem the entire world from the brokenness caused by sin." But even more than that, Saul doesn't really seem *interested* in becoming that sort of leader: the most he ever understands, it seems, is that God has set up certain regulations for certain things (sacrifices, eating meat without blood, etc.), and despite the chances God has given him, he remains firmly set in advancing his own "people's king" agenda. He only wants to jump through God's hoops insofar as they will get him want he wants.

This is for sure the key difference between Peter and Saul. Though he didn't always (maybe I should say "usually") get what Jesus was doing, and left to his own devices, he would flounder, Peter was definitely doing his best to set himself up in alignment with *Jesus's* agenda, and not his own. For that reason, I think, God chose to use Peter's mistakes to build him further into his church, rather than removing him (like he did with, for example, Ananias and Sapphira). And, I suppose, the same works for me -- so long as I'm doing my best to align myself with the purposes that he has stated for his kingdom and the world, God will continue to use my mistakes and disobedient moments to build me into a better servant. What an encouragement! It makes a good "anchor for the soul" (Heb. 6.19) :)

This has getten a lot longer than I thought it was going to be, so I'd better wrap it up. Thanks for your reflection today!

By Jeremy Wolcott on   3/11/2010 10:34 PM

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel